Some attendees of a currently infamous Silicon Valleya|geographic area|geographical region|geographic region} event are disputing its characterization as a “sex party” during a coming back book, with Elon Musk, the founding father of Tesla and SpaceX, oral communication that “nerds on a couch aren’t a ‘cuddle puddle.'”
The event on a night in Gregorian calendar month was a celebration at the house of Steve Jurvetson, then associate capitalist at the venture-capital firm DFJ. it had been initial highlighted earlier this month in associate excerpt from “Brotopia,” the Bloomberg newsperson Emily Chang’s book on the culture of the school business, during which she quoted associate unknown supply describing drug use and open sexual behavior at the party.
Musk’s representative initial confirmed to Business business executive that the bourgeois was attending however aforesaid he was underneath the impression it had been a “corporate party with a fancy dress theme” and saw no sign of it turning into a “sex party” once he left at one a.m.
In a resultant statement to Wired, Musk referred to as Chang’s reportage “salacious nonsense” and aforesaid it had been “misleading.”
He aforesaid (emphasis ours):
“Emily Chang’s article was salacious nonsense. She conflated what happens in SF sex clubs within the Tenderloin, that are around long before geographical region was something, with boring VC parties on the earth. that’s deceptive to the general public and she or he ought to be guilty.
“If there square measure ‘sex parties’ in geographical region, i have not seen or detected of 1. If you wish wild parties, you are within the wrong place. Obviously.
“That DFJ party was boring and company, with zero sex or status anyplace. Nerds on a couch aren’t a ‘cuddle puddle.’ i used to be hounded all night by DFJ-funded entrepreneurs, thus visited sleep around 1am. Nothing remotely price writing regarding happened. the foremost fun issue was Steve lighting a model rocket around hour.”
Other school business figures distinguishing themselves as guests have since conjointly pushed back on the portrayal of the event.
Mary Lou Jepsen, an entrepreneur who was formerly in executive roles at Facebook and Google, tweeted on Thursday: “I was at Steve Jurvetson’s and Genevieve Wolff Lydstone’s Glamazon party — it’s a complete mischaracterization of what went on. It was a great party with brilliant techies, business folks and creatives talking about ideas.”
Another apparent attendee, Mason Hartman, said on social media that she was there until 5 a.m. and saw no sex or nudity and “almost no cuddling.”
“The cuddling that I saw (and we’re talking maximally tame, here) was almost entirely between people who were obviously couples,” Hartman said.
She confirmed there was a “cuddle space” but said she “laid down and napped on-and-off for the last few hours I was there” and wasn’t bothered by anyone.
In a blog post published earlier this week, the entrepreneur Paul Biggar said he didn’t see any sex or drugs and highlighted that it was an official party organized by DFJ. He also raised concerns about the potential for abuse and exploitation at such events.
“Not that sex is bad, nor that sex parties are bad,” he wrote. “Using power to deny access to women, then providing access so long as they have sex with you, that’s abuse, and that’s f—ed up.”
Chang described an account of the party from “Jane Doe” in the book excerpt:
“Doe found herself on the floor with two couples, including a male entrepreneur and his wife. The living room had been blanketed in plush white faux fur and pillows, where, as the evening wore on, several people lay down and started stroking one another, Doe said, in what became a sizable cuddle puddle. One venture capitalist, dressed up as a bunny (it’s unclear how this fit into the edge-of-the-earth theme), offered Jane Doe some powder in a plastic bag. It was Molly. ‘They said it will just make you feel relaxed and you’re going to like being touched,’ Doe recounted to me.”
In a statement to Business Insider, a DFJ representative said the firm was “dismayed to learn of behavior at the party that was completely at odds with DFJ’s culture, which has been, and will continue to be, built on the values of respect and integrity.”
“We would never want anyone to feel uncomfortable, and we are sorry if that happened,” the statement said.
It said the company’s “decisive action” in recent months reflected a “steadfast commitment to our values” — a potential reference to a Recode report that Jurvetson, the host of the party, left DFJ in November following an investigation into his conduct.